Technology / Surface Treatment for Door Hardware: Electroplating vs. Immersion Plating

Recent Posts

Immersion Plating Process Analysis
Advantages
1, Color Versatility:
Supports 50+ metallic finishes (e.g., champagne gold, brushed nickel)

2, Cost Efficiency:
   40-60% lower initial cost compared to PVD coating

Critical Process Challenges
1, Hollow Component Risks:
   Requires precision drying protocol:
   Standard components: 30min @ 80°C (ISO 2812-3)
   Complex geometries: 90-120min with rotational drying

2, Latent Defect Mechanism:
   Residual plating chemicals (pH 2.5-3.5 solutions) accelerate:
   Subsurface corrosion (ASTM G85 Annex A3)
   Electrochemical migration (IPC-610H Class 3)

3, Quality Control Limitations:
   Visual inspection misses 38% of internal residues (per NACE SP0492)

Market Preference Trends

Product TypePreferred FinishKey Drivers
Hollow ComponentsGlossy ImmersionCost-effectiveness
Solid ComponentsMatte Electro/PVD

"- 35% higher corrosion resistance

- HV300-500 surface hardness"

Technical Advisory
1, For Architectural Projects:
   Specify PVD coating (EN 1670 Grade 4) for coastal environments

2,Budget-Conscious Applications:
   Use immersion plating with extended 72hr salt spray certification

3, Luxury Residential:
   Combine matte electroplating with nano-sealing technology

Quality Assurance Protocol
Implement XRF thickness mapping for hollow components
Conduct electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) quarterly
Maintain plating solution analysis per ASTM E1473